Sign up for latest updates
Keep up with the latest news, opinions and developments in H&S legislation and employment law.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Request a callback
If you want to talk about your Employment Law or Health and Safety requirements with one of our experts, please complete the form below and we will call you back within one hour.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

We're helping businesses with Covid compliance, not sure what to do? Click here.

Enter your details below and one of our advisors will contact you shortly

Harassment and Constructive Dismissal Claims | An Employers Guide

Harassment and Constructive Dismissal Claims | An Employers Guide

Date: 18th August 2021 | By: Claire Malley | Categories: Bullying and Harassment, Dismissal, Employment law, Employment Law Legislation, Employment Tribunals, Guides, Legislation Advice

harassment and constructive dismissalA recent case has departed from previous authority when addressing harassment and constructive dismissal claims. In the case of Driscoll v V&P Global Ltd (2021), Ms Driscoll (the Claimant) was employed as an executive assistant by the Respondents for 4 months before she resigned from her post. Her reasons for the resignation were that the CEO had made comments about her sexuality, race and disability, thus amounting to harassment under the Equality Act 2010 leaving her no option but to resign and claim constructive dismissal based on the claims of harassment against the Company and against the CEO himself. It is worth noting, the Claimant has under 2 years’ service.

Harassment and Constructive Dismissal

The Respondents argued Ms Driscoll’s claims were vexatious and intended to intimidate or embarrass the CEO as well put the Company to cost of defending the claim after the Respondents asked her to repay overpaid wages and holiday pay. Employment Tribunal referred to previous case law and struck out the constructive dismissal part of the claim on the basis that constructive dismissal could not amount to an act of harassment under the Equality Act.

Employment Appeal Tribunal

The Claimant appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). EAT held that the previous case law was incompatible with European and UK laws thus was ‘manifestly wrong’. The EAT noted that European Court of Justice took a wide interpretation of what constitutes a dismissal, including voluntary redundancy and retirement, hence including a constructive dismissal.

EAT noted that in the previous case law the court found that a constructive dismissal could amount to a discriminatory act where disability discrimination is claimed. Thus, the EAT found that there was no basis for distinguishing between different types of dismissal when deciding on a claim of discrimination including harassment.

HR Advice for Employers

  • This case makes it clear that where an employee resigns on the back of alleged harassment, the constructive dismissal itself can amount to ‘unwanted conduct’ thus an act of harassment.
  • It is important to note, employees do not need 2 years’ service to bring a claim of harassment under the Equality Act.
  • A short service employee can resign and claim constructive dismissal as a harassment claim. Awards for such claims are uncapped.

Speak to our team of HR Consultants for advice and guidance surrounding constructive dismissal claims from employees and any other HR issues you may have.

Request a callback today »

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.